Ask Dave: Why Do Some People Still Manage to Get Great Results Swinging Their Weights?

There are many approaches and techniques that lifters use to achieve their desired results. One such technique is the seemingly controversial practice of “swinging” weights. While this method may appear unorthodox, it has been observed to yield impressive physical results for some. In this Ask Dave article, Dave DePew explores the underlying principles that may contribute to the effectiveness of swinging weights, examines the potential benefits and risks associated with this training style, and highlights the specific contexts in which it might be most applicable. Whether you’re curious about the science behind swinging weights or considering incorporating it into your routine, this article provides valuable insights and guidance.

Ask Dave: Why Do Some People Still Manage to Get Great Results Swinging Their Weights?

Dave: When evaluating the effectiveness of a training program or someone’s lifting style, there are many principles to consider. The key is to examine how these principles have been applied consistently over the years rather than focusing on a snapshot of their current training habits.

Without specific details about who you’re referring to or the context of their “swinging” weights, I’ll provide some general observations. If someone with an impressive physical structure is seen swinging weights, it suggests that their training stimulus might be effective in some way.

Here are some generalized theories of training and how these principles might contribute to achieving desired results:

1. Progressive Overload: Consistently increasing the weight, volume, or intensity of training to stimulate muscle growth and strength adaptations.
2. Specificity Principle: Training should be relevant and appropriate to the sport or goal to produce specific adaptations.
3. Progression Principle: Gradually increasing the demands on the body to continue making progress.
4. Variation Principle: Incorporating different exercises, intensities, and training modalities to prevent plateaus and overuse injuries.
5. Recovery Principle: Allowing sufficient time for rest and recovery to enable muscle repair and growth.
6. Individualization Principle: Tailoring the program to meet the specific needs and abilities of the individual.
7. Reversibility Principle: Understanding that fitness gains are reversible if training ceases.
8. Diminishing Returns Principle: Recognizing that as an athlete becomes more trained, the rate of improvement will slow.

Potential Role of Swinging in Training

Consideration of Stimulus Response Theory

When evaluating the effectiveness of swinging weights or any other training method, it’s crucial to consider the Stimulus Response Theory, which describes how specific training stimuli lead to particular physiological responses. This theory involves assessing how the characteristics of a workout—such as intensity, volume, and form—translate into adaptations like muscle growth, strength gains, or improved athletic performance.

In the case of swinging weights, the stimulus includes factors such as the explosive nature of the movements, the range of motion, and the load used. The response, on the other hand, can be seen in terms of increased muscle fiber recruitment, enhanced neuromuscular coordination, and potential improvements in power output. However, the training stimulus must be appropriately matched to the individual’s training level and goals to maximize benefits while minimizing risks, such as injury or overtraining.

Incorporating swinging movements effectively requires a thoughtful approach, balancing the intensity and frequency of these exercises with adequate recovery and complementary training modalities. By carefully applying the Stimulus Response Theory, lifters can optimize their training outcomes and ensure that the benefits of swinging weights outweigh the potential drawbacks.

Volume-Load, Mechanical Tension, Strength Curves, and PAP: Key Considerations

Volume-Load refers to the total amount of weight lifted over multiple sets and training sessions. It is a critical factor in hypertrophy and strength gains, as it provides a quantitative measure of the workload the muscles are exposed to over time.

Mechanical Tension is the force exerted on muscles during exercise, accumulating over many repetitions within a set and across sets. It is a primary driver of muscle growth and can vary depending on the exercise, the load used, and the range of motion. The tension experienced by muscle fibers is influenced by the strength curves of exercises, which describe how resistance changes throughout the range of motion.

Incorporating swinging weights into every set requires using heavy loads to accumulate sufficient mechanical tension. The explosive nature of these movements can lead to significant muscle fiber recruitment, promoting the development of power and hypertrophy. This approach can be particularly effective when explosive swinging sets follow earlier sets performed with strict form and sufficient volume load at sub-maximal to maximal intensities.

The technique of Post Activation Potentiation (PAP) might come into play in such scenarios. PAP refers to the phenomenon where the muscles’ force output is temporarily enhanced following heavy or maximal loading. This effect can increase muscle explosiveness, contributing to both power development and hypertrophy.

For optimal results, it’s beneficial to combine explosive swinging movements with sets that emphasize controlled eccentrics and pauses in the lengthened phase of the movement. This combination can create a potent formula for muscle growth and strength, leveraging both the explosive nature of swinging and the time-under-tension provided by controlled movements. Such a balanced approach ensures a comprehensive training stimulus, promoting well-rounded muscular development and strength gains.

Considerations and Risks

Weighted explosive movements, especially those involving swinging, pose a high risk of injury due to the difficulty in controlling the weights. This style of training requires years of preparation, ensuring that the primary muscles, antagonists, and joints are well-conditioned to handle the stress. The forces exerted on the joints must be carefully evaluated to weigh the risks against the potential rewards.

Such movements are often most beneficial for athletes preparing for strength sports that demand specific and specialized exercises. For instance, Olympic weightlifters, Strongman competitors, power curlers, MAS wrestlers, or arm wrestlers may find it challenging to progress without incorporating some form of weight swinging into their training.

While swinging weights might seem unorthodox, it can be a legitimate and effective method within certain contexts, particularly when combined with proper training principles and a solid foundation of strength and conditioning. However, it’s crucial to approach this style of training with caution and a thorough understanding of the potential risks and rewards.

EXERCISES